Final Project— Multimaterial/ Pinching and Smocking

Innan.jpg

mix.jpg

sandkorn.jpg

blandningen.jpg

inprogresse2.jpg

färdig4.jpg

Färdig3.jpg

färdig2.jpg

Färdig1.jpg

We choose to work with flexible formwork with multi-material/ smocking and pinching.

Concept
Our intent was to create a repetition: one shape multiplied and then connected (smocking) with another material: multi-material. This could be applied as modals in an architectural context.

Approach
During the process six square shapes was casted in flexible plastic. Each square was attached to the next with a clamp. It could for example be a wall that is joined to another wall by pinching, where another material (multi-material) make the ”clamp effect” itself. The center of the clamp effect could be where another material makes out a joint. For example a rope, a screw, a bolt or a chain.

As a final conclusion it could be assumed this form in a bigger scale would allow the material being pinched to even better. Now it is fragile and the clamps almost erased what they are suppose to pinch.

Hanna-Thea Björö, Bisera Örn

Advertisements

Assignment 5 Adaptive formwork

Gjutningsmall (kopia)

gjutmall.jpgprocess.jpg

blandning klar.jpg

färdig3.jpgfärdig2.jpgfärdig1.jpg

Material: Cardboard.

We choose to work with cardboard to create a precise shape made out of “mountain” and “valley” folds. We wanted to work with a small shape to keep control over the materials and the shape. Too big of a size would probably become more unstable and also require a big amount of slurry and pebbles. Too small of a size could make it hard to make folds and also create a risk of slurry not entering all gaps.

Conclusion:
We did not get a clear picture of what would be a good size and mix between peeblestone and slurry.
What is relevant sizes according to different sizes and shapes of mould shape?
Hanna-Thea Björö, Bisera Örn

Assignment 04 — Multi material and Smocking & pinching, Group 8

Assignment 04—Multi material and Smocking & pinching.

We chose the two categories, multi material and smocking & pinching.

Multi material — we wanted to work with something that enveloped or “were threaded on” another material. We stitched three fabric parts that we came across an MDF.

smocking and pinching — In the experiment with smocking and pinching we stitched twopieces of fabric shapes.

1. is a simpler version of smocking where some points go inside, others outside.
2. Here, we wanted to test how we could work with smocking and pinching by adding it after we had concrete in the bag. We put on clothes pegs and a cord that we wrapped around.

Group 8, Hanna-Thea Björö och Bisera Örn.

exempel1.jpg

exempel2.jpg

exempel3.jpgberäkning.jpg utförande.jpgutförande 1.jpgfärdig1.jpg

Assignment 2—Group 8

Mix 1 : 7,5 parts sand.

Mix 2 : 0,8 parts water.

Mix 3,4,5 : 3 % pigment.

We started with mix 3, 4 and 5. The pigmented mixes.

*1  This time we decided to make one big mix based on double the amount of cement in the default mix. Then we divided into three and calculated 5 g of pigment in every bucket of mix. We added the pigment into the dry ingredients. Something went wrong again and we realized the importance of precision when putting all things together. So we decided to not make one big mix and divide it again.

*2*3   For some reason a kind of fat texture appeared in the buckets when we added water and the pigment did not blend well. Where there traces of fat dirt in them from earlier experiments?

We called for help and Annie- Locke came to the rescue.

1*1

2*23*3

She pointed out and helped us adjust some things:

*4  Write out the recipe first with all steps included so you easily can go back and analyze your mix.

*5  Small buckets on the small scales instead of large that can set the scale of. We also started to measure one thing at a time instead of putting the scale back to zero all the time and then add the next ingredient. So, if something go wrong you can always double-check separate ingredients instead of losing a hole mix, when unsure.

*6  Pigment is to be added with the dry ingredients.

*7  *8  It is also good to add a little water at a time and allow the dry ingredients react correct and work up the moist.

4*45*56*67*78*8

*9  We got the end result we aimed for, with some minor adjustment to the planned mix. *10  Mix 1 and 2 worked out fine and (*11) here is the end result.

9*910*1011*11

Assignment 03—Fluid form, Group 8

Process —preparing the experiments

We wanted to capture the movement of the concrete but also experiment with the ”drying time”. We let two of the experiments dry for a while before we touched or moved the concrete.

Proces1.jpgProcess1.jpg

Process —Making the experiments

We did two different mixtures. The first mix was wrong, then we mixed silica with water instead of super plasticizer and had to add a lot of water to compensate and make a more fluid mix. We used the mix on two of our experiments. They dried slowly, probably because of the amount of water and the result was a glossy finish. Those forms we had planned to adjust according to the experiment, we let dry for one hour.
What we learned from this is that the order of ingredients is as important as quantity.

The second mix followed the recipe and used in other experiments. We kept one of them since the others broke. The mix dried faster and got a matte finish in the end.

We did various forms with different materials. They gave different results as glossy, matte, various imprints of the material etc.Process 2.jpgProcess2.jpgPro2.jpg

The result

The rule was to remove all material from the mold: only concrete were to remain even if they broke.
As a summary we reflected on that same mix gives different expressions depending on the shape and its material. The way the material is characterized by the shape is extensive and valuable to utilize.Resultat1.jpgResultat2.jpgResultat3.jpg

Grupp 8: Hanna-Thea Björö, Bisera Örn

Termite mound

termite-mound

Made by: Termites
Materials: Dirt, mud, cellulose, saliva and/or dropping

Process:
Mound-building termites live in Africa, Australia and South America and the mounds they create are huge, as big as 30 meters in diameter. They come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes.

The tower like mounds are made of dirt or mud, cellulose, saliva and droppings from both the termites but also from different species living in its surroundings.

What found to be interesting was the structure of the mounds. They can be very complicated. Extensive system of tunnels and conduits serves as a ventilation system for the underground nest of the mound and in order to get good ventilation, the termites will construct several shafts leading down to the cellar located beneath the nest.
Source: http://ilmm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Termite-Mound.jpg

Pāhoehoe, unbroken lava

ropy_pahoehoe

Made by: Unbroken lava
Materials: Lava

Process:

Lava is the molten rock expelled by a volcano during an eruption. The resulting rock after solidification and cooling is also called lava.

Pāhoehoe lava (found in Hawaii) has a smooth, billowy, undulating, or ropy surface. These surface features are due to the movement of very fluid lava under a congealing surface crust. The Hawaiian word, Pāhoehoe, meaning ”smooth, unbroken lava”.

A pāhoehoe flow typically advances as a series of small lobes and toes that continually break out from a cooled crust. The surface texture of pāhoehoe flows varies widely, displaying all kinds of bizarre shapes often referred to as lava sculpture. Pahoehoe lavas typically have a temperature of 1,100 to 1,200 °C.

What I found to be interesting was that the material is in a constant process and development. I further believe that this handling of the material could be something worth investigating.
Source: http://seismo.berkeley.edu/~manga/EPS214/rope.jpg